Problem był już sygnalizowany w przeszłości, jednakże raz jeszcze do niego warto wrócić, tak ze względu na pełen bardzo interesujących danych tekst, jak również kapitalne znaczenie podniesionego problemu. Otóż w USA nauka (tworząca zaplecze potęgi tego państwa) jest rozkładana na łopatki przez idiotyczną i katastrofalną w swych skutkach politykę opartą kardynalny kanon zdegenerowanej politycznej poprawności, który głosi, iż jeżeli chodzi o telenta naukowe, nie ma żadnej różnicy miedzy rasami, nacjami, płciami - i stosownie do tej sensu stricte kreacjonistycznej formuły promuje się w amerykańskiej nauce i edukacji politykę pozytywnej dyskryminacji, wyrównywania różnić, zadośćuczyniania krzywdom historycznym - z wielką szkodą dla samej nauki.
Zainteresowanych problemem odsyłam do zawzmiankowanego materiału, "przeklejając" z niego smakowity kąsek dla zaostrzenia apetytu.



"As for females, they, too, are the target of constant efforts to boost their representation in STEM environments. Yet we are to believe that highly educated heads of research teams are so benighted that they refuse to hire or promote scientists whose superior qualifications would increase the lab’s chance of a scientific breakthrough, just because those scientists are female. The diversity crusade rests on the claim that absent discrimination, every scientific field would show gender parity. That belief is ungrounded. Males outperform females at the highest reaches of mathematical reasoning (and are overrepresented at the lowest level of mathematical incompetence). Differences in math precocity between boys and girls show up as early as kindergarten. For decades, males in every ethnic group have scored higher than females in their same ethnic group on the math SAT. In 2016, the percentage of males scoring above 700 (on an 800-point scale) was nearly twice as large as the percentage of females in that range. There are 2.5 males in the U.S. in the top 0.01 percent of math ability for every female, according to a paper published in February 2018 in the journal Intelligence. But female high-scorers are more likely than male high-scorers to possess strong verbal skills as well, according to authors Jonathan Wai, Jaret Hodges, and Matthew Makel, giving them a greater range of career options. Traditionally, individuals who score well in both the math and verbal domains are less likely to pursue a STEM career. Moreover, females on average are more interested in people-centered rather than abstract work, which helps explain why females account for 75 percent of health-care-related workers but only 14 percent of engineering workers and 25 percent of computer workers. Nearly 82 percent of obstetrics and gynecology medical residents in 2016 were female. Is gynecology biased against males, or are females selecting where they want to work?"

www.city-j(*)cs-harming-sciences-15826.html