||« Ludzie, cytaty
An Interview with Dr. William HarwoodAutor tekstu: Kaz Dziamka
Bill, I have read many of your articles in The
American Rationalist, Free Inquiry, and elsewhere, and I like them immensely. You don't mince words — unlike
many religiously correct humanists and even atheists who are afraid to offend
the incurably meek, the perennially sheepish, and those that have been scared
witless by anti-human god experts. I'd
like to ask you a few questions: OK, I know what you have to say about the
mind-boggling silliness of many Christian and other religious beliefs. But let's
assume that you are on your deathbed (as many of us hope to die, unlike, for
instance, being blown out of the sky by Allah's virgin seekers and endless kinky
sex). On you right side is your non-religious friend or relative trying to
comfort you. On your left side is a local Catholic priest who — having
found out a prominent Canadian atheist is dying — is
hoping for a deathbed conversion. What
do you say to both?
I would tell a nonbeliever at my deathbed,
in the words of a corporal at Little Big Horn, „Please, Mr. Custer, I don't
want to go." I would then add, „Look on the good side. This is the worst
thing that can ever happen to me." I could no more convert to belief in
religion than an astronaut who has looked at the earth from an orbiting space
shuttle could convert to belief in a flat earth. I would tell any priest present,
„If you need to believe in an afterlife to overcome your terror of death and
get you through the day without having to be institutionalized and diapered, do
it on your own time. Right now, you are trespassing."
Please tell me what you would do if you were editor of the American Rationalist?
Please, no British or Australian understatements.
I cannot foresee how I might edit AR. That
is experience talking. I once edited Calamity, the monthly newsletter of Mensa's Calgary local. I quit after two
issues, because I could not stomach the reaction of brain-dead readers.
Admittedly there is a difference. Calamity was written for people whose only common quality was an ability to
score high on I.Q. tests. They averaged the same level in functional
intelligence, educability and rationality as subscribers to Reader's
Digest. I would have no fear of
encountering the same reaction at AR.
But the point is, I could not foresee the consequences of one editing assignment,
and would have to be very reckless to make assumptions on how best to handle
another. My guess would be that I would maintain the previous editor's
procedures, and try making changes slowly, as they occurred to me, only after I was sure I had a fallback position if they failed to work.
You say that North America is still the best place to live, as if Canada was the
same kind of country as the United States, a rather bland, generic appellation.
(As Michael Moore asked: Who are we? „United Statesters"?) Do you really
think Canada and „The Big One" (or "Planet USA") are significantly
Ten years ago I would have said that
Canada was the best place in the world to live. America had a Republican Party
so desperate for power that it was willing to become the puppet of the Mad Dog
Religious Right if that was what it took to get elected-and Canada did not.
Things have changed. Canada now has an Official Opposition, with one-fifth of
the seats in Parliament that wants to do to Canada what the Taliban did to
Afghanistan. That makes Canada and America mirror images. So the best place to
live is now „North America."
President-nominee Dubya Bush considers Jesus Christ his "favorite
philosopher," while our home-grown Christian Ayatollah Ashcroft, who runs
the Department of [In]justice, contends that there is no king but Jesus. Do you
think we can fall lower than this? Or is this the beginning of the end of the
Yankee Christers in the White House?
To quote Kai Nielson (Naturalism and
Religion), „In a recent survey taken in
the United States, 88 percent of the population maintained that they had never
had any doubts about the existence of God. Even if this survey is inaccurate and
this is true of only 40 percent of the population, it is still an intellectual
and moral disgrace-a disgrace that should be a scandal in the United States."
Either that 88 percent have never read their own bible, or they did so only
after putting their brains in OFF. Jesus the Nazirite is portrayed in his own
official biography as a thoroughly despicable human being, who either preached
or was accused of preaching a sermon that can be summarized, „Cheat those who
are no longer useful to you, and use the stolen money to bribe those who are in a position to do you some good."
When political candidates can try to out-butt-lick
one another to praise such a monster, and one of the most mindless sycophants
can actually become president (if only by a treasonous coup d'etat), America
is in a lot of trouble. We have seen what happened when hardcore believers took
over Iran and Afghanistan. No evil is unthinkable to persons who believe they
are obeying a god. Gee Dubya Shrub has already cancelled foreign aid to
countries that won't conform to the American Religious Right's determination
to overpopulate the human species into extinction. If Shrub and his
puppet-masters are not tossed out while there is still time, America will go the
way of Babylon, Ninevah, and the Soviet Union.
Thanks, Bill. I hope our partnership will continue, and I am looking forward to
more intellectual dynamite from your free mind and mighty pen.
I have also
asked Bill to offer a brief opinion about pope John Paul II, a man I consider
completely deluded and dangerously obsessed with political power and
self-glorification. I must say I am
very embarrassed that the current pontiff comes from the same country as I do.
Surely, Poland has much more to offer to modern civilization than this
fourth-century intellect. Every time I think of the „Holy Father," I am reminded of
the dictum that "There is no fool like an old fool." There are many old fools, admittedly, and I may become one as
well — considering how „the Good Lord" has
designed our bodies to age disgracefully. But there is only one such old man who
can cause so much disinformation, confusion, and general retardation as the pope.
Ronald Reagan managed, mercifully, to finish his stint as president
before his brain began to really disintegrate, and we usually shut out
dilapidated ancient bodies from positions of political power. Not the Vatican.
The octogenarian fuddy-duddy, his body grotesquely deformed by eight
decades of bad living and bad thinking, continues to mutter and mumble empty
platitudes, while the sheep continue to hang on his every word, no matter how
absurd or how banal.
Anyhow, when asked about the pope, Bill
referred me to a section in his book Disinformation
Cycle about the wicked Fatima hoax.
An excerpt from William Harwood's
book Disinformation Cycle:
in his papacy, John Paul II made a pilgrimage to Fatima, thereby jeopardizing
the credibility of the Catholic church if the truth was ever revealed. It is
inconceivable that even a man of Karol Wojtyła's minuscule intellectual
capacity could have done something so incredibly stupid-unless he had already
guaranteed that the hoax would never be exposed by destroying the hoaxers'
sealed letter. Perhaps, like 1984's Ministry of Truth, Wojtyła believed
he could change the facts of history by changing what was written about them. As
for the Vatican's recent claim (May 13, 2000) that the sealed letter contained a prophecy of a bishop in a white robe falling in a hail of bullets, that
believers would have no difficulty interpreting as Wojtyła's 1981 escape
from assassination, the Occam's razor explanation is that the pope's
scriptwriter was trying to give the hoax an injection of credibility, even
providing an explanation for the prophecy's original suppression, since
publishing it in 1960 would have been an open invitation to potential assassins
to make the prophecy come true.
William Harwood is Contributing
Editor of the American Rationalist. Kaz Dziamka is Editor in chief of the
American Rationalist and Editor of the English section of Racjonalista.
« Ludzie, cytaty (Publikacja: 10-06-2003 Ostatnia zmiana: 06-10-2003)
Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone. Prawa autorskie tego tekstu należą do autora i/lub serwisu Racjonalista.pl.
Żadna część tego tekstu nie może być przedrukowywana, reprodukowana ani wykorzystywana w jakiejkolwiek formie,
bez zgody właściciela praw autorskich. Wszelkie naruszenia praw autorskich podlegają sankcjom przewidzianym w
kodeksie karnym i ustawie o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych.